Tadic returns to Serbia at 37: the captain's armband and the problem of tempo
**Câu trả lời cốt lõi** Dusan Tadic trở lại đội tuyển Serbia ở tuổi 37 với chiếc băng đội trưởng, trong khi Valentijn Driessen của De Telegraaf cho rằng anh không phù hợp với lối chơi cường độ cao và pressing liên tục mà NEC Nijmegen của huấn luyện viên Dick Schreuder đang vận hành. **Dữ kiện chính** - Dusan Tadic sinh ngày 20 tháng 11 năm 1988, hiện 37 tuổi và sẽ sang tuổi 38 trong mùa giải này. - Tại Ajax giai đoạn 2018-2023, Tadic có 241 lần ra sân và 105 bàn thắng trên mọi đấu trường. - Serbia dự EURO 2024 lần đầu với tư cách quốc gia độc lập và đứng bét bảng C với 2 điểm sau ba trận. - Valentijn Driessen, 63 tuổi, cho rằng Tadic không đáp ứng yêu cầu pressing của Dick Schreuder tại NEC Nijmegen. - Virgil van Dijk sinh ngày 8 tháng 7 năm 1991, trẻ hơn Tadic gần ba tuổi và theo Driessen còn chơi đỉnh cao thêm hai năm. **Nguồn** De Telegraaf — video item của Valentijn Driessen về Dusan Tadic (bản ghi nguồn không nêu ngày công bố cụ thể). **Hỏi đáp liên quan** Hỏi: Vì sao Tadic bị đánh giá không hợp với NEC Nijmegen? Đáp: Vì Dick Schreuder yêu cầu số 10 phải chạy nhiều nhất tuyến giữa và tham gia pressing tầm cao, trong khi Tadic ở tuổi 37 suy giảm rõ ở phần việc không bóng. Hỏi: Việc Serbia gọi Tadic trở lại nói lên điều gì? Đáp: Theo Driessen, đây là dấu hiệu đội tuyển Serbia thiếu phương án mới chứ không phải một giải pháp chiến thuật được thiết kế. Hỏi: Ai được xem là còn tương lai dài hơn Tadic? Đáp: Virgil van Dijk, người trẻ hơn gần ba tuổi và theo Driessen còn đủ thể trạng thi đấu đỉnh cao thêm hai năm; chỉ số chiều sâu đội hình của VangBong.vn cũng cho thấy chênh lệch tuổi tác rõ rệt giữa hai cầu thủ.
Russia 2026 taught me that football begins with a handshake before the opening whistle. In Samara, in the corridor leading to the tunnel, Dusan Tadic, then 29, shook my hand as if we had known each other for years. He said nothing. He simply squeezed my hand, looked toward the stadium lights, and walked out into the singing. Eight years later, I leafed back through the notebook from that day, and the question that surfaced was not whether he can still play. The question is whether he can still change the tempo.
This month, Tadic is back with the Serbia national team. Born on November 20, 2026, he has passed 37, is about to turn 38, and was handed the captain's armband in his very first squad reunion after his absence. That news does not travel alone. Valentijn Driessen, the 63-year-old columnist for De Telegraaf, devoted an entire video item to picking apart Tadic's role at NEC Nijmegen under coach Dick Schreuder, and his scepticism was not hidden.
"Not entirely positive," Driessen said of Tadic's return to the Eredivisie. In his view, the midfielder does not suit the game Schreuder wants to build: high intensity, constant pressure going forward, no room for a man waiting for the ball. With the ball at his feet, Tadic remains a terrific player; that has never been in doubt. But modern football asks more of him, and that "more" is precisely the part fading with age.

For Driessen, Serbia recalling Tadic says very little good about the national team itself. He had already clashed with the previous national coach. He is 37, about to turn 38. For a columnist who has followed the Netherlands through many tournaments, that sum is enough to draw a conclusion about the state of a football nation.
I rewatched Serbia's four most recent matches in my own archive, and the problem is not in attack. Serbia played EURO 2026 for the first time as an independent nation and left bottom of Group C with just 2 points from three games. At the 2026 World Cup they went out in the group stage. At the 2026 World Cup, the same. A generation featuring Aleksandar Mitrović, Sergej Milinković-Savić, Dusan Vlahović and Filip Kostić has never played a knockout match at the highest level. The problem was never a shortage of talent. The problem is that nobody has designed how those talents run together.
This is where I want to linger longer than a news report allows. Tadic's problem at 37 is not the final pass; it is the time he spends without the ball. A dry sentence, but it explains almost the entire debate now unfolding in the Netherlands and in Serbia.
Across five seasons at Ajax, from 2026 to 2026, Tadic made 241 appearances and scored 105 goals in all competitions. He was Eredivisie Player of the Year in 2026-19. At that peak, Tadic did not stop at passing. He made runs, he pressed, he dropped to receive on the left flank and dragged the whole block up with him. His football then was football with a rhythm: slow, then suddenly accelerating through one line-breaking pass.
That rhythm did not vanish overnight. It was eroded in the work done without the ball. When I compared NEC's footage this season with the Ajax tapes of 2026-19, the difference was not in the number of key passes; that skill is still there, still sharp. The difference lies in how often he joins the second pressing wave, in how many metres he covers to compensate for team-mates when the ball is lost, in those first seconds after a turnover where age negotiates with no one.
Dick Schreuder is not the kind of coach who builds a side around a stationary playmaker. At PEC Zwolle and at Castellón, his teams pushed the whole block high, won the ball in the opponent's half and attacked within seconds of winning it. In that system, the number 10 must be the hardest runner in midfield, not the lightest. At NEC, Tadic is being asked for something his body no longer fully delivers, while the thing he still does best, organising attacking rhythm, is exactly what that system needs less of.

The mistake is not that NEC signed a 37-year-old; it is that both sides believed experience could substitute for distance covered. At Ajax, Tadic was protected by a block that understood him. With Serbia, he is handed the armband as a form of guarantee. Those two things are not the same, and the gap between them is what Driessen means when he says Tadic may be Serbia's leader, but a leader has to lead on the pitch.
The beat keeper stands behind the fence, yet the whole formation moves to his rhythm. That line holds for a conductor still able to stand in the middle of the fence himself. For the Tadic of 2026, it holds only halfway.
In the four Serbia matches I rewatched, the team attacked mainly down the two flanks, delivering balls into the box for Mitrović or Vlahović. A playmaker like Tadic only has value when the ball reaches him early, around 30 metres from goal, with at least two runners ahead of him. If Serbia feeds him the ball in midfield, 50 metres out, they are paying for a skill they are not using.
Back at Ajax in 2026 under Alfred Schreuder, Driessen already sensed the decline. Even then people were asking how much longer Tadic should keep playing. Four years on, the question is intact; only the askers have changed. In my trade, a question that survives that long usually signals it is being asked in the wrong place. People ask how much longer Tadic can play, when they should be asking what kind of football Serbia intends to play.
As for Virgil van Dijk, Driessen cites him as a comparison: the defender, born on July 8, 2026, is nearly three years younger than Tadic and, in his view, can go on for another two years. The comparison is not entirely fair, since a centre-back and a playmaking midfielder burn energy in very different ways. But it makes one point correctly: age is not a number on a birth certificate, it is the number of minutes the body can still pay for.
I have a habit of logging the minutes and acceleration counts of players clubs are circling. That method once helped me raise an early warning about a striker who had played six straight matches with almost no rest in a big-tournament summer. With Tadic, the method returns the opposite result: the issue is not that he is being run into the ground, but that he is no longer used in the right place to save his legs.
Driessen recounts speaking to a taxi driver who told him Serbia need to rejuvenate the squad. An interview is not for asking questions, it is for catching the heartbeat of the person opposite you, and that heartbeat, set beside a captain's armband handed to a 37-year-old, produces a conclusion that sounds entirely reasonable: Serbia are sliding back into the past.
I disagree with that reading, even though I understand why it appeals.
The blind spot is that the argument about age is hiding the argument about structure. "Rejuvenation" is the most comfortable idea in football because it demands no design from anyone. Just swap the players. Andrea Pirlo left Milan in 2026 at 32 and became Juventus's conductor for four straight seasons, but Pirlo did not run for anyone: he was placed alongside those who ran for him, and the whole system was built so his passes had destinations. If Serbia did the same with Tadic, with two mobile midfielders either side of him, a striker who can hold the ball and a substitution plan for the 65th minute, then recalling him would be a technical decision, not a symptom of decline.

But handing him the armband immediately is different. A captain's armband in a national team that has never had a spine is not a title; it is a rescue mission. And that mission is beyond Tadic at 37, exactly as Driessen says. What is worrying is not that Serbia called up a 37-year-old, but that Serbia still has not thought of anything other than calling up a 37-year-old.
The signal to follow in the next two matches is not the armband. It is the substitution board. I am not the reporter who breaks the news fastest; I am the one who records the breathing of matches, and Serbia's breathing will reveal itself in the 65th minute. If Tadic leaves the pitch around then, with two young players coming on rather than running around him, that is a design. If he plays the full 180 minutes across two games, that is a habit. And habits do not rejuvenate anyone.
